Between Horizons and Sediments: the Impact of the Anthropocene in History from the Chakrabarty’s “Four Theses” and Claims
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32991/2237-2717.2021v11i2.p348-396Keywords:
Anthropocene, Dipesh Chakrabarty, Theory of History, Climate Change, Historical Agency, Long DurationAbstract
This article analyzes the development the Anthropocene in history developed by the Indian historian Dipesh Chakrabarty in "The Climate of History: Four Theses", published in 2009, and in later writings. We explore how the growing discussion about the Anthropocene has expanded in the field of humanities in the last ten years, following the pioneering ideas from Chakrabarty’s work. We show how the debates that gravitated around Chakrabarty’s proposals call us to rethink several fundamental historical assumptions, such as the redefinition of the human as a historical subject in its new geological dimension and the problems related to the articulations of space-time scales and human agency. According to Chakrabarty, the definition of a geological time caused by human action on the planet creates a crisis in historical experience and reflection. Such a crisis translates into a political impasse, since the institutions, concepts and parameters related to human history are insufficient to deal with a phenomenon of geological significance. A process that goes beyond the dynamics of capitalism and the inequalities it creates, the human aspirations for freedom, equality and emancipation. The fundamental problem is the difficulty in articulating the historical, biological and geological dimensions of humans as subjects of the Anthropocene. We focus on the controversy over the role of capitalism and intrahuman divisions in the new geological regime, the distinction between the global and planetary dimensions and the challenge imposed by the inconsistencies between historical and geological time, as well as the analytical proposals that sought to answer the questions raised by Chakrabarty.
References
Alf Hornborg, “The Political Ecology of the Technocene: Uncovering Ecologically Unequal Exchange in the World-System” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 57-69.
Andreas Malm e Alf Hornborg, “The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative”, The Anthropocene Review, 1, 1, (Janeiro 2014): 62-69.
André F. C. Silva e Gabriel Lopes, “A pandemia de coronavírus e o Antropoceno, In Dominichi M. Sá; Gisele Sanglard; Gilberto Hochman ; Kaori Kodama. Diário da Pandemia: o olhar dos historiadores (São Paulo: Hucitec, 2020): 66-72.
Andrew, Shryock; Daniel L. Smail (Eds) Deep history: the architecture of past and present (London/ Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
Annales, “Editorial: The Anthropocene”, Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017): 161-163, 162.
Ben Dibley, “’Nature is Us’: the Anthropocene and Species-Being”, Transformations – Journal of Media & Culture, 21 (2012). Disponível em: http://www.transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_21/article_07.shtml
Bronislaw Szerszynski, “The Anthropocene Monument: on relating geological and human time”, European Journal of Social Theory, 20, 1, (Janeiro 2017): 111-131, 114.
Bruno Latour, Onde Aterrar: como se orientar politicamente no Antropoceno (Rio de Janeiro: Bazar do Tempo, 2020).
Bruno Latour e Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Conflicts of planetary proportions – a conversation”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, 14, 3 (2020), no prelo. Disponível em:http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/170-PLANETARY-PROPORTIONS.pdf Acesso em 17 de Agosto de 2020.
Catherine Malabou, “The Brain of History, or, the Mentality of the Anthropocene”, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 116, 1 (Janeiro 2017): 39-53.
Clive Hamilton, “Human Destiny in the Anthropocene. In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 32-43, 38.
Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil; François Gemenne, “Thinking the Anthropocene. In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil; François Gemenne (Eds) The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoh (London/New York: Routledge, 2015): 1-13.
Christophe Bonneuil, “The Geological turn – Narratives of the Anthropocene” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 17-31.
Christophe Bonneuil e Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, The Shock of the Anthropocene: the Earth, History and Us, traduzido por David Fernbach (London/ New York: Verso Books, 2016).
Dan Boscov-Ellen, “Whose Universalism? Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Anthropocene”. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 31, 1 (Agosto) 2018: 70-83.
Daniel Hartley, “Against the Anthropocene,” Salvage, August 31, 2015, http://salvage.zone/ in-print/against-the-anthropocene/. Acesso em 25 de Agosto de 2020.
Daniel Lord Smail, On Deep History and the Brain (London/ Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
Deborah Danowski e Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Há mundos por vir? Ensaio sobre os medos e os fins (Florianópolis: Desterro, Cultura e Barbárie e Instituto Socioambiental), 2014.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Provincializing Europe: Potscolonial Thought and Historical Difference” (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Climate of History: Four Theses”, Critical Inquiry, 35, 2 (Winter 2009): 197-222.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Brute Force”. Eurozine, 7 de outubro de 2010. Disponível em: http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2010-10-07-chakrabarty-en.html. Acesso em 10 de Agosto de 2020.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Postcolonial Studies and the Challenge of Climate Change” New Literary History, 43, 1 (Dezembro 2012): 1-18.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Climate and Capital: on Conjoined Histories”, Critical Inquiry, 41, 1 (Autumn 2014): 1-23.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Human Condition in the Anthropocene” The Tanner Lectures in Human Values (Palestra proferida na Universidade de Yale em 18 e 19 de fevereiro de 2015). Disponível em: https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Chakrabarty%20manuscript.pdf.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Anthropocene and the Convergence of Histories” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015b): 44-56.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Humanities in the Anthropocene: the Crisis for an Enduring Kantian Fable”, New Literary History. 47, 2 e 3 (Setembro 2016): 377-397.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Whose Anthropocene? A Response”, In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016b): 103-114.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Politics of Climate Change Is More Than the Politics of Capitalism”, Theory, Culture and Society, 34, 2-3 (Fevereiro 2017): 25-37.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Anthropocene Time”’, History and Theory, 57, 1 (Março 2018): 5-32, 19-20.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Planet: an Emergent Humanist Category”, Critical Inquiry, 46, 1 (Autumn 2019): 1-31.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Human Sciences and Climate Change: a crisis of Anthropocentrism”, Science and Culture (Jan./ Feb. 2020):46-48.
Donna Haraway, “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene”, Environmental Humanities, 6, 1, (Maio 2015): 159–65.
Ewa Domanska, “Beyond Anthropocentrism in Historical Studies”, Historein, 10 (2010): 118-130, 120.
Ewa Domanska, “History, anthropogenic soil, and unbecoming human” In Seth Dube; Sanjay Seth; Ajay Skaria (Eds) Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Global South: Subaltern Studies, Postcolonial Perspectives, and the Anthropocene (London/ New York: Routledge, 2019): 201-214.
François Hartog, Regimes de Historicidade: Presentismo e Experiências do Tempo (Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2013).
Fredrik A. Jonsson, History of the Species? History and Theory, 52 (Outubro 2013): 462-472.
Gregoire Quenet “The Anthropocene and the Time of Historians”, Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017):165-197, 179, 184.
Harriet Johnson, “The Anthropocene as a Negative Universal History”, Adorno Studies, 3, 1 (2019): 47-63.
Helmuth Trischler, “The Anthropocene: a Challenge for the History of Science, Technology and the Environment”. NTM International Journal of History & Ethics of Natural Sciences Technology & Medicine, 24, 3 (Setembro 2016): 309-335.
Ian Baucom, “The Human Shore: Postcolonial Studies in an Age of Natural Science,” History of the Present, 2, 1 (Spring, 2012): 1–23.
Idelber Avelar “Perspectivismo ameríndio e direitos não-humanos” Direito e Democracia. 17 2 (Julho 2016): 5-20
Jason Moore, Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and Accumulation of Capital (London/ New York: Verso, 2015.
Jason W. Moore, “Introduction: Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism” In Jason W. Moore (Org.) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism (Oakland: P.M., 2016): 1-13.
Jessica Barnes, “Rifts or Bridges? Ruptures and Continuities in Human-Environment Interactions ” In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 47-54.
John Guldi e David Armitage, Manifesto pela História. Trad. Modesto Florenzano (Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2018).
John Meyer, “Politics in—but not of—the Anthropocene”, In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 47-54, 50.
John R. McNeill e Peter Engelke. The Great Acceleration: an Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945. (Cambridge, M.A.: Belknap Press of University Harvard Press, 2014).
Julia A. Thomas, “History and Biology in the Anthropocene: Problems of Scale, Problems of Value”, American Historical Review, 119, 5(Dezembro 2014): 1587-1607.
Julio Bentivoglio; Marcelo D. R. Cunha “Dipesh Chakrabarty: subalternização e deseuropeização” In Julio Bentivoglio; Alexandre S. Avelar (Orgs.) O Futuro da História: da Crise à Reconstrução de Teorias e Abordagens (Vitória: Milfontes, 2019): 241-260.
Libby Robin, “Histories for Changing Times: Entering the Anthropocene?”, Australian Historical Studies, 44, 3 (Setembro 2013): 329-340.
Mark B. Lynas, The God Species: Saving the Planet in the Age of Humans (Washington: National Geographic, 2011).
Paul J. Crutzen, “Geology of Mankind”, Nature, 415, 6867 (3 Jan. 2002): 23.
Paul J. Crutzen; Eugen F. Stoermer, ‘The “Anthropocene”’, Global Change Newsletter, 41 (Maio 2002): 17–18.
Pierre A. Charbonnier “Genealogy of the Anthropocene The End of Risk and Limits”. Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017): 199-224, 1999.
Reinhart Koselleck, Futuros Passados: Contribuição à Semântica dos Tempos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro: Editora PUC-Rio, 2006).
Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan, “Foreword and Introduction” In _________ (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, 2 (2016): 5-11.
Sandeep Banerjee, “Beyond the Intimations of Mortality: Chakrabarty, Anthropocene, and the Politics of the (Im)Possible. Mediations”, Journal of the Marxist Literary Group, 30, 2 (Dezembro 2017): 1-14.
Slavoj Žizek, Vivendo o fim dos tempos. Trad. Maria Beatriz Medina (São Paulo: Boitempo, 2012).
Stephen Sawyer, “Time After Time: Narratives of the Longue Durée in the Anthropocene”, Transatlantica, 1 (2015).
Suman Seth, “The Politics of Despair and the Calling of History”, History and Theory, 56, 2 (Junho 2017): 241-257.
Sven Sörlin, “Reform and Responsibility – the Climate of History in Times of Transformation”, Historisk Tiddskrift, 97, 1 (Agosto 2018): 7-23.
Timothy J. Lecain, “Against the Anthropocene: A Neo-Materialist Perspective,” HCM: International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity, 3, 1 (Janeiro 2015): 1–28.
Timothy Lecain, “Heralding a New Humanism: The Radical Implications of Chakrabarty’s ‘Four Theses” In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 15-20.
Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013).
Will Steffen; Jacques Grinevald, Paul J. Crutzen, John R. McNeill,“The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 1938 (Mar. 2011): 842–867.
Zoltán B. Simon, “Why the Anthropocene Has No History: Facing the Unprecedented”, The Anthropocene Review, 4, 3 (Novembro 2017): 239-245.
Zoltán B. Simon, History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21st Century (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).
Zoltán B. Simon, “The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives”, European Journal of Social Theory, 23, 2 (2020): 184-199.
Zoltán B. Simon, Planetary Futures, Planetary History. In Zoltán B. Simon; L. Deile (eds) Historical Understanding: Past, Present and Future (London: Bloomsburry, 2021).
Andreas Malm e Alf Hornborg, “The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative”, The Anthropocene Review, 1, 1, (Janeiro 2014): 62-69.
André F. C. Silva e Gabriel Lopes, “A pandemia de coronavírus e o Antropoceno, In Dominichi M. Sá; Gisele Sanglard; Gilberto Hochman ; Kaori Kodama. Diário da Pandemia: o olhar dos historiadores (São Paulo: Hucitec, 2020): 66-72.
Andrew, Shryock; Daniel L. Smail (Eds) Deep history: the architecture of past and present (London/ Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
Annales, “Editorial: The Anthropocene”, Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017): 161-163, 162.
Ben Dibley, “’Nature is Us’: the Anthropocene and Species-Being”, Transformations – Journal of Media & Culture, 21 (2012). Disponível em: http://www.transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_21/article_07.shtml
Bronislaw Szerszynski, “The Anthropocene Monument: on relating geological and human time”, European Journal of Social Theory, 20, 1, (Janeiro 2017): 111-131, 114.
Bruno Latour, Onde Aterrar: como se orientar politicamente no Antropoceno (Rio de Janeiro: Bazar do Tempo, 2020).
Bruno Latour e Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Conflicts of planetary proportions – a conversation”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, 14, 3 (2020), no prelo. Disponível em:http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/170-PLANETARY-PROPORTIONS.pdf Acesso em 17 de Agosto de 2020.
Catherine Malabou, “The Brain of History, or, the Mentality of the Anthropocene”, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 116, 1 (Janeiro 2017): 39-53.
Clive Hamilton, “Human Destiny in the Anthropocene. In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 32-43, 38.
Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil; François Gemenne, “Thinking the Anthropocene. In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil; François Gemenne (Eds) The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoh (London/New York: Routledge, 2015): 1-13.
Christophe Bonneuil, “The Geological turn – Narratives of the Anthropocene” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 17-31.
Christophe Bonneuil e Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, The Shock of the Anthropocene: the Earth, History and Us, traduzido por David Fernbach (London/ New York: Verso Books, 2016).
Dan Boscov-Ellen, “Whose Universalism? Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Anthropocene”. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 31, 1 (Agosto) 2018: 70-83.
Daniel Hartley, “Against the Anthropocene,” Salvage, August 31, 2015, http://salvage.zone/ in-print/against-the-anthropocene/. Acesso em 25 de Agosto de 2020.
Daniel Lord Smail, On Deep History and the Brain (London/ Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
Deborah Danowski e Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Há mundos por vir? Ensaio sobre os medos e os fins (Florianópolis: Desterro, Cultura e Barbárie e Instituto Socioambiental), 2014.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Provincializing Europe: Potscolonial Thought and Historical Difference” (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Climate of History: Four Theses”, Critical Inquiry, 35, 2 (Winter 2009): 197-222.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Brute Force”. Eurozine, 7 de outubro de 2010. Disponível em: http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2010-10-07-chakrabarty-en.html. Acesso em 10 de Agosto de 2020.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Postcolonial Studies and the Challenge of Climate Change” New Literary History, 43, 1 (Dezembro 2012): 1-18.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Climate and Capital: on Conjoined Histories”, Critical Inquiry, 41, 1 (Autumn 2014): 1-23.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Human Condition in the Anthropocene” The Tanner Lectures in Human Values (Palestra proferida na Universidade de Yale em 18 e 19 de fevereiro de 2015). Disponível em: https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Chakrabarty%20manuscript.pdf.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Anthropocene and the Convergence of Histories” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015b): 44-56.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Humanities in the Anthropocene: the Crisis for an Enduring Kantian Fable”, New Literary History. 47, 2 e 3 (Setembro 2016): 377-397.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Whose Anthropocene? A Response”, In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016b): 103-114.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Politics of Climate Change Is More Than the Politics of Capitalism”, Theory, Culture and Society, 34, 2-3 (Fevereiro 2017): 25-37.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Anthropocene Time”’, History and Theory, 57, 1 (Março 2018): 5-32, 19-20.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Planet: an Emergent Humanist Category”, Critical Inquiry, 46, 1 (Autumn 2019): 1-31.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Human Sciences and Climate Change: a crisis of Anthropocentrism”, Science and Culture (Jan./ Feb. 2020):46-48.
Donna Haraway, “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene”, Environmental Humanities, 6, 1, (Maio 2015): 159–65.
Ewa Domanska, “Beyond Anthropocentrism in Historical Studies”, Historein, 10 (2010): 118-130, 120.
Ewa Domanska, “History, anthropogenic soil, and unbecoming human” In Seth Dube; Sanjay Seth; Ajay Skaria (Eds) Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Global South: Subaltern Studies, Postcolonial Perspectives, and the Anthropocene (London/ New York: Routledge, 2019): 201-214.
François Hartog, Regimes de Historicidade: Presentismo e Experiências do Tempo (Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2013).
Fredrik A. Jonsson, History of the Species? History and Theory, 52 (Outubro 2013): 462-472.
Gregoire Quenet “The Anthropocene and the Time of Historians”, Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017):165-197, 179, 184.
Harriet Johnson, “The Anthropocene as a Negative Universal History”, Adorno Studies, 3, 1 (2019): 47-63.
Helmuth Trischler, “The Anthropocene: a Challenge for the History of Science, Technology and the Environment”. NTM International Journal of History & Ethics of Natural Sciences Technology & Medicine, 24, 3 (Setembro 2016): 309-335.
Ian Baucom, “The Human Shore: Postcolonial Studies in an Age of Natural Science,” History of the Present, 2, 1 (Spring, 2012): 1–23.
Idelber Avelar “Perspectivismo ameríndio e direitos não-humanos” Direito e Democracia. 17 2 (Julho 2016): 5-20
Jason Moore, Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and Accumulation of Capital (London/ New York: Verso, 2015.
Jason W. Moore, “Introduction: Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism” In Jason W. Moore (Org.) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism (Oakland: P.M., 2016): 1-13.
Jessica Barnes, “Rifts or Bridges? Ruptures and Continuities in Human-Environment Interactions ” In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 47-54.
John Guldi e David Armitage, Manifesto pela História. Trad. Modesto Florenzano (Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2018).
John Meyer, “Politics in—but not of—the Anthropocene”, In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 47-54, 50.
John R. McNeill e Peter Engelke. The Great Acceleration: an Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945. (Cambridge, M.A.: Belknap Press of University Harvard Press, 2014).
Julia A. Thomas, “History and Biology in the Anthropocene: Problems of Scale, Problems of Value”, American Historical Review, 119, 5(Dezembro 2014): 1587-1607.
Julio Bentivoglio; Marcelo D. R. Cunha “Dipesh Chakrabarty: subalternização e deseuropeização” In Julio Bentivoglio; Alexandre S. Avelar (Orgs.) O Futuro da História: da Crise à Reconstrução de Teorias e Abordagens (Vitória: Milfontes, 2019): 241-260.
Libby Robin, “Histories for Changing Times: Entering the Anthropocene?”, Australian Historical Studies, 44, 3 (Setembro 2013): 329-340.
Mark B. Lynas, The God Species: Saving the Planet in the Age of Humans (Washington: National Geographic, 2011).
Paul J. Crutzen, “Geology of Mankind”, Nature, 415, 6867 (3 Jan. 2002): 23.
Paul J. Crutzen; Eugen F. Stoermer, ‘The “Anthropocene”’, Global Change Newsletter, 41 (Maio 2002): 17–18.
Pierre A. Charbonnier “Genealogy of the Anthropocene The End of Risk and Limits”. Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017): 199-224, 1999.
Reinhart Koselleck, Futuros Passados: Contribuição à Semântica dos Tempos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro: Editora PUC-Rio, 2006).
Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan, “Foreword and Introduction” In _________ (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, 2 (2016): 5-11.
Sandeep Banerjee, “Beyond the Intimations of Mortality: Chakrabarty, Anthropocene, and the Politics of the (Im)Possible. Mediations”, Journal of the Marxist Literary Group, 30, 2 (Dezembro 2017): 1-14.
Slavoj Žizek, Vivendo o fim dos tempos. Trad. Maria Beatriz Medina (São Paulo: Boitempo, 2012).
Stephen Sawyer, “Time After Time: Narratives of the Longue Durée in the Anthropocene”, Transatlantica, 1 (2015).
Suman Seth, “The Politics of Despair and the Calling of History”, History and Theory, 56, 2 (Junho 2017): 241-257.
Sven Sörlin, “Reform and Responsibility – the Climate of History in Times of Transformation”, Historisk Tiddskrift, 97, 1 (Agosto 2018): 7-23.
Timothy J. Lecain, “Against the Anthropocene: A Neo-Materialist Perspective,” HCM: International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity, 3, 1 (Janeiro 2015): 1–28.
Timothy Lecain, “Heralding a New Humanism: The Radical Implications of Chakrabarty’s ‘Four Theses” In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 15-20.
Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013).
Will Steffen; Jacques Grinevald, Paul J. Crutzen, John R. McNeill,“The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 1938 (Mar. 2011): 842–867.
Zoltán B. Simon, “Why the Anthropocene Has No History: Facing the Unprecedented”, The Anthropocene Review, 4, 3 (Novembro 2017): 239-245.
Zoltán B. Simon, History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21st Century (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).
Zoltán B. Simon, “The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives”, European Journal of Social Theory, 23, 2 (2020): 184-199.
Zoltán B. Simon, Planetary Futures, Planetary History. In Zoltán B. Simon; L. Deile (eds) Historical Understanding: Past, Present and Future (London: Bloomsburry, 2021).
Downloads
Published
2021-08-17
How to Cite
Silva, A. F., & Lopes, G. (2021). Between Horizons and Sediments: the Impact of the Anthropocene in History from the Chakrabarty’s “Four Theses” and Claims. Historia Ambiental Latinoamericana Y Caribeña (HALAC) Revista De La Solcha, 11(2), 348–396. https://doi.org/10.32991/2237-2717.2021v11i2.p348-396
Issue
Section
Articles
License
This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that providing free scientific knowledge to the public provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
As of the publication in the magazine the authors have copyright and publication rights of their articles without restrictions.
The HALAC Magazine follows the legal precepts of the Creative Commons - Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International license. 
