Entre Horizontes e Sedimentos: o Impacto do Antropoceno na História a partir de Chakrabarty e seus Interlocutores
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32991/2237-2717.2021v11i2.p348-396Palavras-chave:
Antropoceno, Dipesh Chakrabarty, Teoria da História, Mudanças Climáticas, Agência Histórica, Longa DuraçãoResumo
O
O presente artigo analisa os desdobramentos da ideia do Antropoceno na história a partir das reflexões desenvolvidas pelo historiador indiano Dipesh Chakrabarty no artigo “O Clima da História: Quatro Teses”, publicado em 2009, e em escritos posteriores, mapeando seus principais argumentos e as controvérsias que suscitaram. Apresentamos como a crescente discussão do termo se ampliou no campo das humanidades nos últimos 10 anos a partir das reflexões pioneiras de Chakrabarty, as quais assumiram centralidade no debate, em interlocução com historiadores e demais pesquisadores das humanidades em função do caráter controverso de suas ideias e densidade filosófica. Mostramos como os debates que gravitam ao redor das propostas de Chakrabarty fazem repensar diversos pressupostos fundamentais da história, como a redefinição do humano como sujeito histórico ao assumir dimensão geológica na história e os problemas relacionados às articulações de escalas espaço-temporais exigidas pela hipótese de uma época geológica marcada pela agência humana. Segundo Chakrabarty, a definição de uma época geológica provocada pela ação humana no planeta instaura uma crise na experiência e reflexão históricas. Tal crise se traduz em impasse político, uma vez que as instituições, concepções e parâmetros referentes à história humana para ele são insuficientes para lidar com fenômeno de magnitude geológica que extrapola a dinâmica do capitalismo, as desigualdades que ele engendra e as aspirações humanas de liberdade, igualdade e emancipação. Fraturas no pensamento originam-se da dificuldade em articular as dimensões histórica, biológica e geológica dos humanos enquanto sujeitos do Antropoceno. Focamos na controvérsia sobre o papel do capitalismo e das clivagens intra-humanas no novo regime geológico, na distinção entre as dimensões global e planetária e no desafio imposto pelas incongruências entre o tempo histórico e geológico, bem como as propostas analíticas que procuraram responder às questões levantadas por Chakrabarty.
Referências
Alf Hornborg, “The Political Ecology of the Technocene: Uncovering Ecologically Unequal Exchange in the World-System” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 57-69.
Andreas Malm e Alf Hornborg, “The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative”, The Anthropocene Review, 1, 1, (Janeiro 2014): 62-69.
André F. C. Silva e Gabriel Lopes, “A pandemia de coronavírus e o Antropoceno, In Dominichi M. Sá; Gisele Sanglard; Gilberto Hochman ; Kaori Kodama. Diário da Pandemia: o olhar dos historiadores (São Paulo: Hucitec, 2020): 66-72.
Andrew, Shryock; Daniel L. Smail (Eds) Deep history: the architecture of past and present (London/ Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
Annales, “Editorial: The Anthropocene”, Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017): 161-163, 162.
Ben Dibley, “’Nature is Us’: the Anthropocene and Species-Being”, Transformations – Journal of Media & Culture, 21 (2012). Disponível em: http://www.transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_21/article_07.shtml
Bronislaw Szerszynski, “The Anthropocene Monument: on relating geological and human time”, European Journal of Social Theory, 20, 1, (Janeiro 2017): 111-131, 114.
Bruno Latour, Onde Aterrar: como se orientar politicamente no Antropoceno (Rio de Janeiro: Bazar do Tempo, 2020).
Bruno Latour e Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Conflicts of planetary proportions – a conversation”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, 14, 3 (2020), no prelo. Disponível em:http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/170-PLANETARY-PROPORTIONS.pdf Acesso em 17 de Agosto de 2020.
Catherine Malabou, “The Brain of History, or, the Mentality of the Anthropocene”, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 116, 1 (Janeiro 2017): 39-53.
Clive Hamilton, “Human Destiny in the Anthropocene. In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 32-43, 38.
Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil; François Gemenne, “Thinking the Anthropocene. In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil; François Gemenne (Eds) The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoh (London/New York: Routledge, 2015): 1-13.
Christophe Bonneuil, “The Geological turn – Narratives of the Anthropocene” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 17-31.
Christophe Bonneuil e Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, The Shock of the Anthropocene: the Earth, History and Us, traduzido por David Fernbach (London/ New York: Verso Books, 2016).
Dan Boscov-Ellen, “Whose Universalism? Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Anthropocene”. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 31, 1 (Agosto) 2018: 70-83.
Daniel Hartley, “Against the Anthropocene,” Salvage, August 31, 2015, http://salvage.zone/ in-print/against-the-anthropocene/. Acesso em 25 de Agosto de 2020.
Daniel Lord Smail, On Deep History and the Brain (London/ Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
Deborah Danowski e Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Há mundos por vir? Ensaio sobre os medos e os fins (Florianópolis: Desterro, Cultura e Barbárie e Instituto Socioambiental), 2014.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Provincializing Europe: Potscolonial Thought and Historical Difference” (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Climate of History: Four Theses”, Critical Inquiry, 35, 2 (Winter 2009): 197-222.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Brute Force”. Eurozine, 7 de outubro de 2010. Disponível em: http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2010-10-07-chakrabarty-en.html. Acesso em 10 de Agosto de 2020.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Postcolonial Studies and the Challenge of Climate Change” New Literary History, 43, 1 (Dezembro 2012): 1-18.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Climate and Capital: on Conjoined Histories”, Critical Inquiry, 41, 1 (Autumn 2014): 1-23.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Human Condition in the Anthropocene” The Tanner Lectures in Human Values (Palestra proferida na Universidade de Yale em 18 e 19 de fevereiro de 2015). Disponível em: https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Chakrabarty%20manuscript.pdf.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Anthropocene and the Convergence of Histories” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015b): 44-56.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Humanities in the Anthropocene: the Crisis for an Enduring Kantian Fable”, New Literary History. 47, 2 e 3 (Setembro 2016): 377-397.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Whose Anthropocene? A Response”, In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016b): 103-114.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Politics of Climate Change Is More Than the Politics of Capitalism”, Theory, Culture and Society, 34, 2-3 (Fevereiro 2017): 25-37.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Anthropocene Time”’, History and Theory, 57, 1 (Março 2018): 5-32, 19-20.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Planet: an Emergent Humanist Category”, Critical Inquiry, 46, 1 (Autumn 2019): 1-31.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Human Sciences and Climate Change: a crisis of Anthropocentrism”, Science and Culture (Jan./ Feb. 2020):46-48.
Donna Haraway, “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene”, Environmental Humanities, 6, 1, (Maio 2015): 159–65.
Ewa Domanska, “Beyond Anthropocentrism in Historical Studies”, Historein, 10 (2010): 118-130, 120.
Ewa Domanska, “History, anthropogenic soil, and unbecoming human” In Seth Dube; Sanjay Seth; Ajay Skaria (Eds) Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Global South: Subaltern Studies, Postcolonial Perspectives, and the Anthropocene (London/ New York: Routledge, 2019): 201-214.
François Hartog, Regimes de Historicidade: Presentismo e Experiências do Tempo (Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2013).
Fredrik A. Jonsson, History of the Species? History and Theory, 52 (Outubro 2013): 462-472.
Gregoire Quenet “The Anthropocene and the Time of Historians”, Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017):165-197, 179, 184.
Harriet Johnson, “The Anthropocene as a Negative Universal History”, Adorno Studies, 3, 1 (2019): 47-63.
Helmuth Trischler, “The Anthropocene: a Challenge for the History of Science, Technology and the Environment”. NTM International Journal of History & Ethics of Natural Sciences Technology & Medicine, 24, 3 (Setembro 2016): 309-335.
Ian Baucom, “The Human Shore: Postcolonial Studies in an Age of Natural Science,” History of the Present, 2, 1 (Spring, 2012): 1–23.
Idelber Avelar “Perspectivismo ameríndio e direitos não-humanos” Direito e Democracia. 17 2 (Julho 2016): 5-20
Jason Moore, Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and Accumulation of Capital (London/ New York: Verso, 2015.
Jason W. Moore, “Introduction: Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism” In Jason W. Moore (Org.) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism (Oakland: P.M., 2016): 1-13.
Jessica Barnes, “Rifts or Bridges? Ruptures and Continuities in Human-Environment Interactions ” In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 47-54.
John Guldi e David Armitage, Manifesto pela História. Trad. Modesto Florenzano (Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2018).
John Meyer, “Politics in—but not of—the Anthropocene”, In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 47-54, 50.
John R. McNeill e Peter Engelke. The Great Acceleration: an Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945. (Cambridge, M.A.: Belknap Press of University Harvard Press, 2014).
Julia A. Thomas, “History and Biology in the Anthropocene: Problems of Scale, Problems of Value”, American Historical Review, 119, 5(Dezembro 2014): 1587-1607.
Julio Bentivoglio; Marcelo D. R. Cunha “Dipesh Chakrabarty: subalternização e deseuropeização” In Julio Bentivoglio; Alexandre S. Avelar (Orgs.) O Futuro da História: da Crise à Reconstrução de Teorias e Abordagens (Vitória: Milfontes, 2019): 241-260.
Libby Robin, “Histories for Changing Times: Entering the Anthropocene?”, Australian Historical Studies, 44, 3 (Setembro 2013): 329-340.
Mark B. Lynas, The God Species: Saving the Planet in the Age of Humans (Washington: National Geographic, 2011).
Paul J. Crutzen, “Geology of Mankind”, Nature, 415, 6867 (3 Jan. 2002): 23.
Paul J. Crutzen; Eugen F. Stoermer, ‘The “Anthropocene”’, Global Change Newsletter, 41 (Maio 2002): 17–18.
Pierre A. Charbonnier “Genealogy of the Anthropocene The End of Risk and Limits”. Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017): 199-224, 1999.
Reinhart Koselleck, Futuros Passados: Contribuição à Semântica dos Tempos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro: Editora PUC-Rio, 2006).
Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan, “Foreword and Introduction” In _________ (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, 2 (2016): 5-11.
Sandeep Banerjee, “Beyond the Intimations of Mortality: Chakrabarty, Anthropocene, and the Politics of the (Im)Possible. Mediations”, Journal of the Marxist Literary Group, 30, 2 (Dezembro 2017): 1-14.
Slavoj Žizek, Vivendo o fim dos tempos. Trad. Maria Beatriz Medina (São Paulo: Boitempo, 2012).
Stephen Sawyer, “Time After Time: Narratives of the Longue Durée in the Anthropocene”, Transatlantica, 1 (2015).
Suman Seth, “The Politics of Despair and the Calling of History”, History and Theory, 56, 2 (Junho 2017): 241-257.
Sven Sörlin, “Reform and Responsibility – the Climate of History in Times of Transformation”, Historisk Tiddskrift, 97, 1 (Agosto 2018): 7-23.
Timothy J. Lecain, “Against the Anthropocene: A Neo-Materialist Perspective,” HCM: International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity, 3, 1 (Janeiro 2015): 1–28.
Timothy Lecain, “Heralding a New Humanism: The Radical Implications of Chakrabarty’s ‘Four Theses” In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 15-20.
Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013).
Will Steffen; Jacques Grinevald, Paul J. Crutzen, John R. McNeill,“The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 1938 (Mar. 2011): 842–867.
Zoltán B. Simon, “Why the Anthropocene Has No History: Facing the Unprecedented”, The Anthropocene Review, 4, 3 (Novembro 2017): 239-245.
Zoltán B. Simon, History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21st Century (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).
Zoltán B. Simon, “The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives”, European Journal of Social Theory, 23, 2 (2020): 184-199.
Zoltán B. Simon, Planetary Futures, Planetary History. In Zoltán B. Simon; L. Deile (eds) Historical Understanding: Past, Present and Future (London: Bloomsburry, 2021).
Andreas Malm e Alf Hornborg, “The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative”, The Anthropocene Review, 1, 1, (Janeiro 2014): 62-69.
André F. C. Silva e Gabriel Lopes, “A pandemia de coronavírus e o Antropoceno, In Dominichi M. Sá; Gisele Sanglard; Gilberto Hochman ; Kaori Kodama. Diário da Pandemia: o olhar dos historiadores (São Paulo: Hucitec, 2020): 66-72.
Andrew, Shryock; Daniel L. Smail (Eds) Deep history: the architecture of past and present (London/ Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
Annales, “Editorial: The Anthropocene”, Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017): 161-163, 162.
Ben Dibley, “’Nature is Us’: the Anthropocene and Species-Being”, Transformations – Journal of Media & Culture, 21 (2012). Disponível em: http://www.transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_21/article_07.shtml
Bronislaw Szerszynski, “The Anthropocene Monument: on relating geological and human time”, European Journal of Social Theory, 20, 1, (Janeiro 2017): 111-131, 114.
Bruno Latour, Onde Aterrar: como se orientar politicamente no Antropoceno (Rio de Janeiro: Bazar do Tempo, 2020).
Bruno Latour e Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Conflicts of planetary proportions – a conversation”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, 14, 3 (2020), no prelo. Disponível em:http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/170-PLANETARY-PROPORTIONS.pdf Acesso em 17 de Agosto de 2020.
Catherine Malabou, “The Brain of History, or, the Mentality of the Anthropocene”, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 116, 1 (Janeiro 2017): 39-53.
Clive Hamilton, “Human Destiny in the Anthropocene. In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 32-43, 38.
Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil; François Gemenne, “Thinking the Anthropocene. In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil; François Gemenne (Eds) The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoh (London/New York: Routledge, 2015): 1-13.
Christophe Bonneuil, “The Geological turn – Narratives of the Anthropocene” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015): 17-31.
Christophe Bonneuil e Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, The Shock of the Anthropocene: the Earth, History and Us, traduzido por David Fernbach (London/ New York: Verso Books, 2016).
Dan Boscov-Ellen, “Whose Universalism? Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Anthropocene”. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 31, 1 (Agosto) 2018: 70-83.
Daniel Hartley, “Against the Anthropocene,” Salvage, August 31, 2015, http://salvage.zone/ in-print/against-the-anthropocene/. Acesso em 25 de Agosto de 2020.
Daniel Lord Smail, On Deep History and the Brain (London/ Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
Deborah Danowski e Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Há mundos por vir? Ensaio sobre os medos e os fins (Florianópolis: Desterro, Cultura e Barbárie e Instituto Socioambiental), 2014.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Provincializing Europe: Potscolonial Thought and Historical Difference” (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Climate of History: Four Theses”, Critical Inquiry, 35, 2 (Winter 2009): 197-222.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Brute Force”. Eurozine, 7 de outubro de 2010. Disponível em: http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2010-10-07-chakrabarty-en.html. Acesso em 10 de Agosto de 2020.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Postcolonial Studies and the Challenge of Climate Change” New Literary History, 43, 1 (Dezembro 2012): 1-18.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Climate and Capital: on Conjoined Histories”, Critical Inquiry, 41, 1 (Autumn 2014): 1-23.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Human Condition in the Anthropocene” The Tanner Lectures in Human Values (Palestra proferida na Universidade de Yale em 18 e 19 de fevereiro de 2015). Disponível em: https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Chakrabarty%20manuscript.pdf.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Anthropocene and the Convergence of Histories” In Clive Hamilton; Christophe Bonneuil e François Gemenne (Eds). The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (London/ New York: Routledge, 2015b): 44-56.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Humanities in the Anthropocene: the Crisis for an Enduring Kantian Fable”, New Literary History. 47, 2 e 3 (Setembro 2016): 377-397.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Whose Anthropocene? A Response”, In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016b): 103-114.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Politics of Climate Change Is More Than the Politics of Capitalism”, Theory, Culture and Society, 34, 2-3 (Fevereiro 2017): 25-37.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Anthropocene Time”’, History and Theory, 57, 1 (Março 2018): 5-32, 19-20.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Planet: an Emergent Humanist Category”, Critical Inquiry, 46, 1 (Autumn 2019): 1-31.
Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Human Sciences and Climate Change: a crisis of Anthropocentrism”, Science and Culture (Jan./ Feb. 2020):46-48.
Donna Haraway, “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene”, Environmental Humanities, 6, 1, (Maio 2015): 159–65.
Ewa Domanska, “Beyond Anthropocentrism in Historical Studies”, Historein, 10 (2010): 118-130, 120.
Ewa Domanska, “History, anthropogenic soil, and unbecoming human” In Seth Dube; Sanjay Seth; Ajay Skaria (Eds) Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Global South: Subaltern Studies, Postcolonial Perspectives, and the Anthropocene (London/ New York: Routledge, 2019): 201-214.
François Hartog, Regimes de Historicidade: Presentismo e Experiências do Tempo (Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2013).
Fredrik A. Jonsson, History of the Species? History and Theory, 52 (Outubro 2013): 462-472.
Gregoire Quenet “The Anthropocene and the Time of Historians”, Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017):165-197, 179, 184.
Harriet Johnson, “The Anthropocene as a Negative Universal History”, Adorno Studies, 3, 1 (2019): 47-63.
Helmuth Trischler, “The Anthropocene: a Challenge for the History of Science, Technology and the Environment”. NTM International Journal of History & Ethics of Natural Sciences Technology & Medicine, 24, 3 (Setembro 2016): 309-335.
Ian Baucom, “The Human Shore: Postcolonial Studies in an Age of Natural Science,” History of the Present, 2, 1 (Spring, 2012): 1–23.
Idelber Avelar “Perspectivismo ameríndio e direitos não-humanos” Direito e Democracia. 17 2 (Julho 2016): 5-20
Jason Moore, Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and Accumulation of Capital (London/ New York: Verso, 2015.
Jason W. Moore, “Introduction: Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism” In Jason W. Moore (Org.) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism (Oakland: P.M., 2016): 1-13.
Jessica Barnes, “Rifts or Bridges? Ruptures and Continuities in Human-Environment Interactions ” In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 47-54.
John Guldi e David Armitage, Manifesto pela História. Trad. Modesto Florenzano (Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2018).
John Meyer, “Politics in—but not of—the Anthropocene”, In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 47-54, 50.
John R. McNeill e Peter Engelke. The Great Acceleration: an Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945. (Cambridge, M.A.: Belknap Press of University Harvard Press, 2014).
Julia A. Thomas, “History and Biology in the Anthropocene: Problems of Scale, Problems of Value”, American Historical Review, 119, 5(Dezembro 2014): 1587-1607.
Julio Bentivoglio; Marcelo D. R. Cunha “Dipesh Chakrabarty: subalternização e deseuropeização” In Julio Bentivoglio; Alexandre S. Avelar (Orgs.) O Futuro da História: da Crise à Reconstrução de Teorias e Abordagens (Vitória: Milfontes, 2019): 241-260.
Libby Robin, “Histories for Changing Times: Entering the Anthropocene?”, Australian Historical Studies, 44, 3 (Setembro 2013): 329-340.
Mark B. Lynas, The God Species: Saving the Planet in the Age of Humans (Washington: National Geographic, 2011).
Paul J. Crutzen, “Geology of Mankind”, Nature, 415, 6867 (3 Jan. 2002): 23.
Paul J. Crutzen; Eugen F. Stoermer, ‘The “Anthropocene”’, Global Change Newsletter, 41 (Maio 2002): 17–18.
Pierre A. Charbonnier “Genealogy of the Anthropocene The End of Risk and Limits”. Annales HSS (English Edition), 72, 2, (Junho 2017): 199-224, 1999.
Reinhart Koselleck, Futuros Passados: Contribuição à Semântica dos Tempos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro: Editora PUC-Rio, 2006).
Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan, “Foreword and Introduction” In _________ (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, 2 (2016): 5-11.
Sandeep Banerjee, “Beyond the Intimations of Mortality: Chakrabarty, Anthropocene, and the Politics of the (Im)Possible. Mediations”, Journal of the Marxist Literary Group, 30, 2 (Dezembro 2017): 1-14.
Slavoj Žizek, Vivendo o fim dos tempos. Trad. Maria Beatriz Medina (São Paulo: Boitempo, 2012).
Stephen Sawyer, “Time After Time: Narratives of the Longue Durée in the Anthropocene”, Transatlantica, 1 (2015).
Suman Seth, “The Politics of Despair and the Calling of History”, History and Theory, 56, 2 (Junho 2017): 241-257.
Sven Sörlin, “Reform and Responsibility – the Climate of History in Times of Transformation”, Historisk Tiddskrift, 97, 1 (Agosto 2018): 7-23.
Timothy J. Lecain, “Against the Anthropocene: A Neo-Materialist Perspective,” HCM: International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity, 3, 1 (Janeiro 2015): 1–28.
Timothy Lecain, “Heralding a New Humanism: The Radical Implications of Chakrabarty’s ‘Four Theses” In Robert Emmet e Thomas Lekan (Eds) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses. Special Issue Transformations in Environment and Society, v. 2 (2016): 15-20.
Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013).
Will Steffen; Jacques Grinevald, Paul J. Crutzen, John R. McNeill,“The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 1938 (Mar. 2011): 842–867.
Zoltán B. Simon, “Why the Anthropocene Has No History: Facing the Unprecedented”, The Anthropocene Review, 4, 3 (Novembro 2017): 239-245.
Zoltán B. Simon, History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21st Century (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).
Zoltán B. Simon, “The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives”, European Journal of Social Theory, 23, 2 (2020): 184-199.
Zoltán B. Simon, Planetary Futures, Planetary History. In Zoltán B. Simon; L. Deile (eds) Historical Understanding: Past, Present and Future (London: Bloomsburry, 2021).
Downloads
Publicado
2021-08-17
Como Citar
Silva, A. F., & Lopes, G. (2021). Entre Horizontes e Sedimentos: o Impacto do Antropoceno na História a partir de Chakrabarty e seus Interlocutores. Historia Ambiental Latinoamericana Y Caribeña (HALAC) Revista De La Solcha, 11(2), 348–396. https://doi.org/10.32991/2237-2717.2021v11i2.p348-396
Edição
Seção
Artigos
Licença
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista HALAC segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional. 
